Once upon a time, in a land far away, lived a beautiful princess named Snow White. She had hair as black as ebony, skin as white as snow, and lips as red as blood. Snow White was known for her pure heart and kindness towards all creatures, both big and small. One day, while wandering in the enchanted forest, Snow White stumbled upon a hidden grove filled with magical creatures. These creatures, unlike anything she had ever seen before, were a mix of fairies, unicorns, and talking animals. They all lived harmoniously in the grove, protecting it from any harm that might come its way.
A source connected with the production explained that they will be rather like the trolls in Frozen, or JRR Tolkein's hobbits. They will have two legs, two arms and a face with eyes, nose and a mouth . . . but not be actually human.
The reboot comes as - since 2020 - Disney have slapped racism warnings on some of its most iconic movies, including Peter Pan and The Jungle Book, to alert viewers to sensitive scenes. That was always my impression of the Disney film too I m not really well versed into the original fairy tale , I always thought that they were dwarves as in magical creatures, not dwarves as in human beings with dwarfism.
They all lived harmoniously in the grove, protecting it from any harm that might come its way. Feeling drawn to the magical beings, Snow White spent her days in the grove, immersing herself in the wonders of their world. The fairies taught her how to harness her own magical abilities, and the unicorns allowed her to ride on their backs, soaring through the sky.
‘Snow White’: Disney's 'Snow White' features 'magical creatures' instead of dwarfs (Up: Disney backtracks on revocation; set photos actually real)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
airbagged_
Member Jan 21, 2019 5,337 Charleston, SC Conservatives are gonna lose their minds over this. Ugh.Lulu
Saw the truth behind the copied door
Member Oct 25, 2017 24,458 this is technically spoilersL Thammy
Spacenoid
Banned Oct 25, 2017 47,188 Dwarves are mythic creatures, Dwarfs is the plural of people with Dwarfism, a very real condition.I don't think that's substantially true. "Dwarfs" was just the common plural until J.R.R. Tolkien popularized the rare plural "dwarves".
Like if you look at the Wikipedia page for the mythological creature, the plural primarily used is still "dwarfs".
The only reason I personally used "dwarves" is that I think it sounds better.
Arc
The Fallen Oct 25, 2017 4,022 This is going to bomb hard.Nida
Member Aug 31, 2019 9,624 Everett, Washington Imagine The Hobbit with these. Alterations.Downhome
Member Oct 27, 2017 1,353That was always my impression of the Disney film too (I'm not really well versed into the original fairy tale), I always thought that they were dwarves as in magical creatures, not dwarves as in human beings with dwarfism.
Yes, same. I have never, once, ever looked at this story as anything else. They are clearly fantastical beings that just happen to be of a smaller stature. Not to mention, a production like this being done as the animated classic would provide opportunities for legitimate smaller folks who may be looking for a big break which may not come otherwise. I think it's significantly worse to erase those roles from existence where anyone else could be cast in them. I think it was "Hornswoggle" that really spoke out about this when it really broke.
I believe this is all happening in the first place because Peter Dinklage said on a podcast or something about how doing the movie again was "backwards" by casting a latina in the main role yet still having dwarves in the film. As if he speaks for all actors in that category. Multiple others spoke out after it saying they would have killed to have been a part of the movie and would have been proud to take the role of one of the legendary 7 characters.
Dwarfism writer Steph Robson said she hoped film producers make an effort to avoid stereotypes in its retelling of the classic movie.
Snow White became friends with all the creatures, sharing meals with the talking animals and dancing with the fairies under the moonlight. She learned their secrets and listened to their stories, becoming a trusted confidant to each and every one. In return, Snow White used her own powers to heal and protect the grove and its inhabitants. Her pure heart and unconditional love for the magical creatures made her a powerful ally in their mission to preserve the harmony of the forest. However, not everyone appreciated Snow White's bond with the magical beings. The wicked witch, jealous of Snow White's beauty and connection to the creatures, tried to sabotage their friendship. She cast an evil spell on Snow White, making her fall into a deep slumber from which she could only be awakened by true love's kiss. The creatures of the grove, devastated by Snow White's plight, worked tirelessly to find a prince who could wake her from her slumber. They searched far and wide until they found a prince who proved his love for Snow White by braving numerous obstacles to reach her side. True love's kiss broke the wicked witch's spell, and Snow White awoke to find herself surrounded by the magical creatures who had never left her side. Together, they defeated the witch and restored peace to the grove. From that moment on, Snow White's bond with the magical creatures grew even stronger. She became their protector and continued to use her powers for the greater good of the enchanted forest. And so, Snow White and the magical creatures lived happily ever after, sharing their love, magic, and harmony with all who entered their world..
Reviews for "The Magical Kingdom: Exploring Snow White's World of Creatures"
1. Emily - 2/5 - I was really disappointed with "Snow White and the Magical Creatures". The storyline felt very unoriginal and cliché, and I found it hard to get invested in the characters. The magical creatures themselves were also a letdown - they lacked depth and didn't bring anything new to the story. Overall, it felt like a generic retelling of the classic Snow White tale, and I was hoping for something more imaginative and engaging.
2. Michael - 1/5 - "Snow White and the Magical Creatures" was a complete waste of time for me. The plot was poorly developed, and the characters were one-dimensional and lacked any depth. The magical creatures were introduced as if they would bring some excitement to the story, but their presence was minimal and didn't make much of an impact. I found myself constantly wanting the movie to end, as it failed to captivate me or offer anything of substance. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone looking for a compelling and original retelling of Snow White.
3. Sarah - 2/5 - I had high hopes for "Snow White and the Magical Creatures", but it fell flat for me. The storyline felt rushed and lacked coherence. The magical creatures seemed out of place and didn't contribute much to the overall plot. The film also failed to create a sense of magic and wonder, which is essential for a fairy tale retelling. Overall, it was a mediocre adaptation that didn't live up to its potential. I wouldn't watch it again or recommend it to others.
4. David - 2/5 - "Snow White and the Magical Creatures" was a disappointing film for me. The characters felt underdeveloped and lacked depth, making it hard to truly care about their journey. The magical creatures were introduced abruptly and didn't have a strong presence throughout the movie. The pacing was also off, with moments that felt rushed and others that dragged on. It's a forgettable retelling of a beloved tale that failed to add anything new or captivating to the story. I wouldn't recommend it to fans of fantasy or fairy tales.